- Newest year: 2012
- Gas
- Standard SUVs
2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover MPG & Fuel Cost
11 model years · 12–22 MPG combined
15,000 mi/yr · premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026)
Cheaper to fuel than 4 of 10 standard SUV configurations, MY2012. Ranked against all rated configurations, not sales-weighted.
2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover at a glance
The 2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover covers 11 model years in the EPA database (33 configurations in all), rated 12–22 MPG combined. The newest model year, 2012, costs about $3,740 a year to fuel for its most efficient version, the Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD (22 MPG), at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026). EPA changed the ratings in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012; 2008 repeat the values of the year before. The best combined rating in the generation, 22 MPG, was reached in 2012.
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover by model year
| Model year | Powertrains | Combined | $/yr | EPA ratings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Gas | 14–22 MPG | $3,740–$5,840 | Ratings changed |
| 2011 | Gas | 14–15 MPG | $5,500–$5,840 | Ratings changed |
| 2010 | Gas | 14–15 MPG | $5,360–$5,740 | Ratings changed |
| 2009 | Gas | 14–15 MPG | $5,360–$5,740 | Ratings changed |
| 2008 | Gas | 14–15 MPG | $4,360–$4,670 | Same EPA ratings as 2007 |
| 2007 | Gas | 14–15 MPG | $4,360–$4,670 | Ratings changed |
| 2006 | Gas | 14 MPG | $4,670 | Ratings changed |
| 2005 | Gas | 12 MPG | $6,700 | Ratings changed |
| 2004 | Gas | 12 MPG | $6,700 | Ratings changed |
| 2003 | Gas | 13 MPG | $6,180 | Ratings changed |
| 2002 | Gas | 12 MPG | $6,700 | First year |
What the 2012 Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD costs to drive
Per month
$312
$3,740 a year ÷ 12
Per 25 miles
$6.23
Per 100 miles
$24.93
Five years
$18,700
5 × the yearly cost, prices held at today's level
vs the standard SUV median
$290more a year
Class median $3,450 a year, MY2012
Based on 15,000 miles a year and premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2012 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
Versus 2011: The most efficient configuration moves from 15 to 22 MPG, up 7. Its annual cost goes from $5,500 to $3,740, $1,760 less.
Gas configurations (5)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evoque (Most efficient) | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 4WD | 18 | 27 | 22 | $3,740 |
| Sport 5.0L 8-cyl | 5.0L 8-cyl | 4WD | 13 | 18 | 15 | $5,500 |
| Range Rover 5.0L 8-cyl | 5.0L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 19 | 15 | $5,520 |
| Range Rover 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,810 |
| Sport 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 17 | 14 | $5,840 |
5 configurations require or recommend higher-octane gasoline and are costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2011 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
14–15 MPG · $5,500–$5,840/yr
Versus 2010: The most efficient configuration stays at 15 MPG. Its annual cost goes from $5,360 to $5,500, $140 more.
Gas configurations (4)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport 5.0L 8-cyl (Most efficient) | 5.0L 8-cyl | 4WD | 13 | 18 | 15 | $5,500 |
| Range Rover 5.0L 8-cyl | 5.0L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 19 | 15 | $5,520 |
| Range Rover 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,810 |
| Sport 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 17 | 14 | $5,840 |
4 configurations require or recommend higher-octane gasoline and are costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2010 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
14–15 MPG · $5,360–$5,740/yr
Versus 2009: The most efficient configuration stays at 15 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $5,360.
Gas configurations (4)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport 5.0L 8-cyl (Most efficient) | 5.0L 8-cyl | 4WD | 13 | 18 | 15 | $5,360 |
| Range Rover 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,740 |
| Range Rover 5.0L 8-cyl | 5.0L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,740 |
| Sport 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 5.0L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 17 | 14 | $5,740 |
4 configurations require or recommend higher-octane gasoline and are costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
14–15 MPG · $5,360–$5,740/yr
Versus 2008: The most efficient configuration stays at 15 MPG. Its annual cost goes from $4,360 to $5,360, $1,000 more.
Gas configurations (4)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport 4.4L 8-cyl (Most efficient) | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 15 | $5,360 |
| Range Rover 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,740 |
| Range Rover 4.4L 8-cyl | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,740 |
| Sport 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $5,740 |
4 configurations require or recommend higher-octane gasoline and are costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2008 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
Same EPA ratings as 2007
EPA lists the same ratings for the 2008 Land Rover Range Rover as for the 2007 model, so the configurations and costs are the ones in the 2007 section above.See 2007
2007 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
14–15 MPG · $4,360–$4,670/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2006: The most efficient configuration moves from 14 to 15 MPG, up 1. Its annual cost goes from $4,670 to $4,360, $310 less.
Gas configurations (4)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport 4.4L 8-cyl (Most efficient) | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
| Range Rover 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $4,670 |
| Range Rover 4.4L 8-cyl | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $4,670 |
| Sport 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $4,670 |
2006 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
14 MPG · $4,670/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2005: The most efficient configuration moves from 12 to 14 MPG, up 2. Its annual cost goes from $6,700 to $4,670, $2,030 less.
Gas configurations (4)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Rover 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged (Most efficient) | 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 17 | 14 | $4,670 |
| Range Rover 4.4L 8-cyl | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 13 | 17 | 14 | $4,670 |
| Sport 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4.2L 8-cyl supercharged | 4WD | 12 | 17 | 14 | $4,670 |
| Sport 4.4L 8-cyl | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 12 | 18 | 14 | $4,670 |
2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
12 MPG · $6,700/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2004: The most efficient configuration stays at 12 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $6,700.
Gas configurations (1)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Rover (Most efficient) | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 11 | 15 | 12 | $6,700 |
1 configuration requires or recommends higher-octane gasoline and is costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2004 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
12 MPG · $6,700/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2003: The most efficient configuration moves from 13 to 12 MPG, down 1. Its annual cost goes from $6,180 to $6,700, $520 more.
Gas configurations (1)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Rover (Most efficient) | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 11 | 15 | 12 | $6,700 |
1 configuration requires or recommends higher-octane gasoline and is costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2003 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
13 MPG · $6,180/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2002: The most efficient configuration moves from 12 to 13 MPG, up 1. Its annual cost goes from $6,700 to $6,180, $520 less.
Gas configurations (1)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Rover (Most efficient) | 4.4L 8-cyl | 4WD | 11 | 16 | 13 | $6,180 |
1 configuration requires or recommends higher-octane gasoline and is costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG
12 MPG · $6,700/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Gas configurations (1)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Rover (Most efficient) | 4.6L 8-cyl | 4WD | 11 | 14 | 12 | $6,700 |
1 configuration requires or recommends higher-octane gasoline and is costed at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
Fuel cost by state
Yearly cost of the Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD: $4,450 in California and $3,240 in Texas, a $1,210 difference.
- California $4,450
- Washington $4,190
- New York $3,690
- Florida $3,410
- Texas $3,240
Similar cars
Closest combined MPG among MY2012 standard SUV models.
Generations
- 2000-2001 (P38A)
- 2002-2012 (L322)
- 2013-2021 (L405)
- 2022-2027* (L460)
Frequently asked questions
What gas mileage does the 2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover get?
EPA rates the 2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover at 12–22 MPG combined across 33 configurations and 11 model years. The most efficient version, the 2012 Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD, is rated 22 MPG (18 city, 27 highway).
Which years had the best MPG in the 2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover?
The Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD reached the generation's best combined rating, 22 MPG, in 2012. The lowest top rating, 12 MPG, was in 2002, 2004 and 2005.
Did EPA ratings change during the 2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover?
Yes. Ratings changed in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. In 2008 the values repeat the year before.
How does the 2002-2012 Land Rover Range Rover compare with the previous generation?
The previous generation (2000-2001 Land Rover Range Rover) is rated 12–13 MPG combined and costs $6,180–$6,700 a year to fuel; the 2002-2012 model is rated 12–22 MPG and costs $3,740–$6,700 a year.
How much does it cost to fuel a 2012 Land Rover Range Rover per year?
Driving 15,000 miles a year at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026), the Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD costs about $3,740 a year. Across all 5 configurations the cost runs $3,740–$5,840 a year. That is a $2,100 difference between the cheapest and the costliest configuration.
How much does it cost to drive a 2012 Land Rover Range Rover 100 miles?
About $24.93 per 100 miles for the Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD at premium gasoline $5.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026), and between $24.93 and $38.93 across all configurations. That is the annual cost over 15,000 miles divided by 150.
Is the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover more efficient in the city or on the highway?
The Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD is rated 18 city and 27 highway MPG, so it is more efficient on the highway, by 9 MPG.
How does the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover compare with other standard SUV configurations?
The Evoque 2.0L 4-cyl turbo 4WD costs about $3,740 a year to fuel, $290 more than the class median of $3,450, and less than 4 of 10 standard SUV configurations. The comparison covers all 273 rated standard SUV configurations for MY2012, not weighted by sales.
Is the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover different from the 2011 model?
The most efficient configuration moves from 15 to 22 MPG, up 7. Its annual cost goes from $5,500 to $3,740, $1,760 less. EPA lists 5 configurations for 2012 against 4 configurations for 2011. See the 2011 Land Rover Range Rover for that year.