Gallonly

Toyota Highlander vs Mazda CX-90: fuel economy and fuel cost

In model year 2026 the Toyota Highlander is the cheaper of the two to fuel: about $1,860 a year for its lowest-cost configuration (Highlander Hybrid LTD/PLAT, 35 MPG combined), against $2,620 for the Mazda CX-90 (CX-90, 25 MPG combined). That is $760 a year, or $3,800 over five years.

One of the two is offered only with a hybrid or plug-in hybrid powertrain in this model year; the other has gasoline configurations. Costs assume 15,000 miles a year and the same fuel and electricity prices for both vehicles, using the EPA combined rating (55% city, 45% highway). Each figure is rounded to $10 and every difference is calculated from the rounded values.

Illustration: Standard SUVs
  • Hybrid
  • Standard SUVs

Toyota Highlander

Lowest fuel cost configuration

Highlander Hybrid LTD/PLAT

35 MPG
Combined
35 MPG
City
34 MPG
Highway
Annual fuel cost
$1,860

$12.40 per 100 miles

15,000 mi/yr, same fuel prices

3 configurations in MY2026

Illustration: Standard SUVs
  • Hybrid
  • Standard SUVs

Mazda CX-90

Lowest fuel cost configuration

CX-90

25 MPG
Combined
23 MPG
City
28 MPG
Highway

Plug-in versions (electric or plug-in hybrid) are not used for this headline; see the powertrain table below.

Annual fuel cost
$2,620

$17.47 per 100 miles

15,000 mi/yr, same fuel prices

3 configurations in MY2026

What the fuel costs

Annual fuel cost of the lowest-cost configuration

  • Toyota Highlander$1,860 a year · $12.40 per 100 mi
  • Mazda CX-90$2,620 a year · $17.47 per 100 mi

Difference per year

$760

Toyota Highlander costs less to fuel

Over 5 years

$3,800

$760 a year × 5, 15,000 mi/yr, same fuel prices

Head to head, MY2026

Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-90 compared on their lowest fuel cost configuration
Measure Toyota Highlander Mazda CX-90
Lowest-cost configuration Highlander Hybrid LTD/PLATCX-90
Powertrain HybridHybrid
Combined rating 35 MPG (better)25 MPG
City rating 35 MPG (better)23 MPG
Highway rating 34 MPG (better)28 MPG
Annual fuel cost $1,860/yr (better)$2,620/yr
Cost per 100 miles $12.40 (better)$17.47
Annual cost range, all configurations $1,860–$2,750$2,290–$3,190
Configurations in MY2026 33
EPA class Standard SUVsStandard SUVs

Best configuration by powertrain

Lowest-cost configuration of each powertrain, Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-90
Powertrain Toyota Highlander Mazda CX-90
Gas 24 MPG · $2,750/yr Highlander Not offered in MY2026
Hybrid 35 MPG · $1,860/yr Highlander Hybrid LTD/PLAT 25 MPG · $2,620/yr CX-90
Plug-in hybrid Not offered in MY2026 26 MPG gas-only · $2,290/yr CX-90

Each cell shows the combined rating and the annual fuel cost of the lowest-cost configuration with that powertrain.

Where each one comes out ahead

Generated from the numbers above, comparing the lowest fuel cost configurations. No subjective judgements.

Toyota Highlander

  • Lower annual fuel cost: $1,860 vs $2,620
  • Higher combined rating: 35 MPG vs 25 MPG
  • Higher city rating: 35 MPG vs 23 MPG
  • Higher highway rating: 34 MPG vs 28 MPG
  • Offers gas configurations in MY2026; the Mazda CX-90 does not

Mazda CX-90

  • Offers plug-in hybrid configurations in MY2026; the Toyota Highlander does not

Year by year

Combined rating and annual fuel cost by model year, Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-90
Model year Toyota Highlander Mazda CX-90
CombinedPer yearCombinedPer year
2026 24–35 MPG $1,860–$2,750 25–26 MPG $2,290–$3,190
2025 24–35 MPG $1,860–$2,750 25 MPG $2,380–$3,240
2024 24–36 MPG $1,820–$2,750 25 MPG $2,380–$3,240

Earlier model years are costed with today's fuel prices, so the table shows how each model's efficiency changed, not what fuel cost at the time. Ranges cover every configuration of that model year.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper to fuel, the Toyota Highlander or the Mazda CX-90?

The Toyota Highlander is cheaper: about $1,860 a year against $2,620 for the Mazda CX-90, a difference of $760 a year. That compares the lowest-cost configuration of each in model year 2026 at 15,000 miles a year with the same fuel prices.

How much would the Toyota Highlander save over five years?

About $3,800 ($760 a year for five years), assuming 15,000 miles a year and the same fuel prices. Your total depends on how much you drive and on local prices; see fuel cost by state.

Which has the better fuel economy rating, the Toyota Highlander or the Mazda CX-90?

The Toyota Highlander is rated 35 MPG combined against 25 MPG for the Mazda CX-90. City: 35 MPG vs 23 MPG. Highway: 34 MPG vs 28 MPG. These are the EPA ratings of each model's lowest-cost configuration.

How is the annual fuel cost calculated?

Distance of 15,000 miles a year at the EPA combined rating (55% city, 45% highway). Gasoline is priced at $4.36/gal (EIA U.S. average for regular, Sep 2026) and electricity at 18.3¢/kWh (EIA U.S. residential average, Jul 2026); premium and diesel configurations use their own EIA prices. Each result is rounded to $10, and differences are calculated from the rounded figures.

Are the Toyota Highlander and the Mazda CX-90 in the same class?

Yes. The EPA classes both as Standard SUVs.

Explore these cars

EPA ratings: fueleconomy.gov file of Sep 29, 2026 · Prices: EIA regular gasoline, U.S. avg, Sep 2026 ($4.36/gal); residential electricity, U.S. avg, Jul 2026 (18.3¢/kWh) · 15,000 mi/yr, 55% city, same prices for both vehicles