Gallonly
2010 Toyota Matrix Touring Package (E140)
Shown: 2010 Toyota Matrix Touring Package (E140). Photo: Elise240SX, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
  • Newest year: 2013
  • Gas
  • Wagons

2009-2013 Toyota Matrix MPG & Fuel Cost

5 model years · 22–29 MPG combined

29 MPG
Combined
26 MPG
City
32 MPG
Highway
Annual fuel cost · Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD
$2,290

15,000 mi/yr · regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026)

Cheaper to fuel than 8 of 10 wagon configurations, MY2013. Ranked against all rated configurations, not sales-weighted.

2009-2013 Toyota Matrix at a glance

The 2009-2013 Toyota Matrix covers 5 model years in the EPA database (25 configurations in all), rated 22–29 MPG combined. The newest model year, 2013, costs about $2,290 a year to fuel for its most efficient version, the Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD (29 MPG), at regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026). EPA changed the ratings in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The best combined rating in the generation, 29 MPG, was reached in 2011, 2012 and 2013.

2009-2013 Toyota Matrix by model year

2009-2013 Toyota Matrix: EPA combined rating and yearly fuel cost for each model year
Model yearPowertrainsCombined$/yrEPA ratings
2013 Gas 22–29 MPG $2,290–$2,930 Ratings changed
2012 Gas 22–29 MPG $2,290–$2,930 Ratings changed
2011 Gas 22–29 MPG $2,290–$2,930 Ratings changed
2010 Gas 22–28 MPG $2,330–$2,970 Ratings changed
2009 Gas 22–28 MPG $2,330–$2,970 First year

What the 2013 Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD costs to drive

Per month

$191

$2,290 a year ÷ 12

Per 25 miles

$3.82

Per 100 miles

$15.27

Five years

$11,450

5 × the yearly cost, prices held at today's level

vs the wagon median

$440less a year

Class median $2,730 a year, MY2013

Based on 15,000 miles a year and regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).

2013 Toyota Matrix MPG

Versus 2012: The most efficient configuration stays at 29 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,290.

Gas · 1.8L, 2.4L
Combined
22–29 MPG
Per year
$2,290–$2,930

Gas configurations (5)

2013 Toyota Matrix gas configurations: EPA ratings and annual cost
TrimEngineDriveCityHwyComb.$/yr
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 26 32 29 $2,290
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Automatic 4-spd 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 25 31 27 $2,400
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Automatic (S5) 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,730
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,740
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 20 26 22 $2,930

2012 Toyota Matrix MPG

22–29 MPG · $2,290–$2,930/yr

Versus 2011: The most efficient configuration stays at 29 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,290.

Gas · 1.8L, 2.4L
Combined
22–29 MPG
Per year
$2,290–$2,930

Gas configurations (5)

2012 Toyota Matrix gas configurations: EPA ratings and annual cost
TrimEngineDriveCityHwyComb.$/yr
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 26 32 29 $2,290
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Automatic 4-spd 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 25 31 27 $2,400
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Automatic (S5) 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,710
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,740
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 20 26 22 $2,930

2011 Toyota Matrix MPG

22–29 MPG · $2,290–$2,930/yr

Versus 2010: The most efficient configuration moves from 28 to 29 MPG, up 1. Its annual cost goes from $2,330 to $2,290, $40 less.

Gas · 1.8L, 2.4L
Combined
22–29 MPG
Per year
$2,290–$2,930

Gas configurations (5)

2011 Toyota Matrix gas configurations: EPA ratings and annual cost
TrimEngineDriveCityHwyComb.$/yr
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 26 32 29 $2,290
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Automatic 4-spd 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 25 31 27 $2,400
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Automatic (S5) 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,720
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,740
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 20 26 22 $2,930

2010 Toyota Matrix MPG

22–28 MPG · $2,330–$2,970/yr

Versus 2009: The most efficient configuration stays at 28 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,330.

Gas · 1.8L, 2.4L
Combined
22–28 MPG
Per year
$2,330–$2,970

Gas configurations (5)

2010 Toyota Matrix gas configurations: EPA ratings and annual cost
TrimEngineDriveCityHwyComb.$/yr
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Automatic 4-spd (Most efficient) 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 25 31 28 $2,330
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 26 32 28 $2,330
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,720
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Automatic (S5) 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 29 24 $2,720
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 2.4L 4-cyl AWD 20 26 22 $2,970

2009 Toyota Matrix MPG

22–28 MPG · $2,330–$2,970/yr
Gas · 1.8L, 2.4L
Combined
22–28 MPG
Per year
$2,330–$2,970

Gas configurations (5)

2009 Toyota Matrix gas configurations: EPA ratings and annual cost
TrimEngineDriveCityHwyComb.$/yr
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Automatic 4-spd (Most efficient) 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 25 31 28 $2,330
Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 1.8L 4-cyl FWD 26 32 28 $2,330
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Manual 5-spd 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 28 24 $2,720
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl FWD Automatic (S5) 2.4L 4-cyl FWD 21 29 24 $2,720
Matrix 2.4L 4-cyl 4WD 2.4L 4-cyl 4WD 20 26 22 $2,970

Fuel cost by state

Yearly cost of the Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD: $3,120 in California and $2,000 in Texas, a $1,120 difference.

Gasoline prices: California: California state average; Washington: Washington state average; New York: New York state average; Florida: Florida state average; Texas: Texas state average (Sep 2026).
Fuel cost in every state

Similar cars

Closest combined MPG among MY2013 wagon models.

EPA ratings: fueleconomy.gov file of Sep 29, 2026 · Prices: EIA regular gasoline, U.S. average, Sep 2026 ($4.36/gal) · 15,000 mi/yr, 55% city / 45% highway · How we calculate

Generations

Frequently asked questions

What gas mileage does the 2009-2013 Toyota Matrix get?

EPA rates the 2009-2013 Toyota Matrix at 22–29 MPG combined across 25 configurations and 5 model years. The most efficient version, the 2013 Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD, is rated 29 MPG (26 city, 32 highway).

Which years had the best MPG in the 2009-2013 Toyota Matrix?

The Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD reached the generation's best combined rating, 29 MPG, in 2011, 2012 and 2013. The lowest top rating, 28 MPG, was in 2009 and 2010.

Did EPA ratings change during the 2009-2013 Toyota Matrix?

Yes. Ratings changed in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

How does the 2009-2013 Toyota Matrix compare with the previous generation?

The previous generation (2003-2008 Toyota Matrix) is rated 24–29 MPG combined and costs $2,250–$3,350 a year to fuel; the 2009-2013 model is rated 22–29 MPG and costs $2,290–$2,970 a year.

How much does it cost to fuel a 2013 Toyota Matrix per year?

Driving 15,000 miles a year at regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026), the Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD costs about $2,290 a year. Across all 5 configurations the cost runs $2,290–$2,930 a year. That is a $640 difference between the cheapest and the costliest configuration.

How much does it cost to drive a 2013 Toyota Matrix 100 miles?

About $15.27 per 100 miles for the Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD at regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026), and between $15.27 and $19.53 across all configurations. That is the annual cost over 15,000 miles divided by 150.

Is the 2013 Toyota Matrix more efficient in the city or on the highway?

The Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD is rated 26 city and 32 highway MPG, so it is more efficient on the highway, by 6 MPG.

How does the 2013 Toyota Matrix compare with other wagon configurations?

The Matrix 1.8L 4-cyl FWD costs about $2,290 a year to fuel, $440 less than the class median of $2,730, and less than 8 of 10 wagon configurations. The comparison covers all 39 rated wagon configurations for MY2013, not weighted by sales.

Is the 2013 Toyota Matrix different from the 2012 model?

The most efficient configuration stays at 29 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,290. EPA lists 5 configurations for 2013 against 5 configurations for 2012. See the 2012 Toyota Matrix for that year.