- Newest year: 2011
- Gas
- Small pickups
2000-2011 Ford Ranger MPG & Fuel Cost
12 model years · 15–24 MPG combined
15,000 mi/yr · regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026)
Cheaper to fuel than 10 of 10 small pickup configurations, MY2011. Ranked against all rated configurations, not sales-weighted.
2000-2011 Ford Ranger at a glance
The 2000-2011 Ford Ranger covers 12 model years in the EPA database (116 configurations in all), rated 15–24 MPG combined. The newest model year, 2011, costs about $2,770 a year to fuel for its most efficient version, the Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD (24 MPG), at regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026). Powertrains over the years: gas and electric. EPA changed the ratings in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The best combined rating in the generation, 24 MPG, was reached in 2010 and 2011.
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
2000-2011 Ford Ranger by model year
| Model year | Powertrains | Combined | $/yr | EPA ratings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Gas | 16–24 MPG | $2,770–$4,110 | Ratings changed |
| 2010 | Gas | 15–24 MPG | $2,720–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2009 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2008 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2007 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2006 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2005 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2004 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2003 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2002 | Gas | 15–23 MPG | $2,840–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2001 | Gas, Electric | 15–23 MPG, 58 MPGe | $1,590–$4,360 | Ratings changed |
| 2000 | Gas, Electric | 15–22 MPG, 56–58 MPGe | $1,590–$4,360 | First year |
What the 2011 Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD costs to drive
Per month
$231
$2,770 a year ÷ 12
Per 25 miles
$4.62
Per 100 miles
$18.47
Five years
$13,850
5 × the yearly cost, prices held at today's level
vs the small pickup median
$750less a year
Class median $3,520 a year, MY2011
Based on 15,000 miles a year and regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026).
2011 Ford Ranger MPG
Versus 2010: The most efficient configuration stays at 24 MPG. Its annual cost goes from $2,720 to $2,770, $50 more.
Gas configurations (6)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 22 | 27 | 24 | $2,770 |
| Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 23 | 20 | $3,190 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,720 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,860 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 17 | $3,940 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,110 |
2010 Ford Ranger MPG
15–24 MPG · $2,720–$4,360/yr
Versus 2009: The most efficient configuration moves from 23 to 24 MPG, up 1. Its annual cost goes from $2,840 to $2,720, $120 less.
Gas configurations (6)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 22 | 27 | 24 | $2,720 |
| Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 21 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Ranger 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
2009 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
Versus 2008: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (6)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 26 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 21 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
2008 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
Versus 2007: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (10)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 26 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 22 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 0 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
2007 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2006: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (10)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 26 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 0 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
2006 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2005: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (10)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 27 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 21 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 0 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
2005 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2004: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (10)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 27 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 21 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 0 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
2004 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2003: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (10)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 27 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 21 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 0 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
2003 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2002: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (11)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 26 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 20 | 24 | 22 | $2,970 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 17 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 16 | 19 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 1 more configuration
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFV | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 18 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
Flex-fuel (E85) configurations are costed on gasoline, not E85.
2002 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG · $2,840–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2001: The most efficient configuration stays at 23 MPG. Its annual cost stays at $2,840.
Gas configurations (11)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 25 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 18 | 23 | 20 | $3,270 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 17 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 1 more configuration
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 16 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| FFV | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 13 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
Flex-fuel (E85) configurations are costed on gasoline, not E85.
2001 Ford Ranger MPG
15–23 MPG, 58 MPGe · $1,590–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
Versus 2000: The most efficient configuration moves from 22 to 23 MPG, up 1. Its annual cost goes from $2,970 to $2,840, $130 less.
EPA range 50 miles.
See electric configurationsGas configurations (13)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 21 | 26 | 23 | $2,840 |
| Pickup 2.5L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 2.5L 4-cyl | RWD | 19 | 24 | 21 | $3,110 |
| Pickup 2.3L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 2.3L 4-cyl | RWD | 18 | 23 | 20 | $3,270 |
| Pickup 2.5L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 4-spd | 2.5L 4-cyl | RWD | 18 | 22 | 19 | $3,440 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 20 | 18 | $3,630 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 3 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 21 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| FFV | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
Flex-fuel (E85) configurations are costed on gasoline, not E85.
Electric configurations (1)
| Trim | Drive | kWh/100 mi | MPGe | Range | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup (Most efficient) | 2-Wheel Drive | 58 | 58 | 50 mi | $1,590 |
MPGe is the distance an electric car travels on 33.7 kWh, the energy in a gallon of gasoline. Fewer kWh per 100 miles means a lower running cost.
2000 Ford Ranger MPG
15–22 MPG, 56–58 MPGe · $1,590–$4,360/yr
EPA re-estimated ratings of 1985-2007 vehicles under its 2008 method; these figures are the re-estimated values.
EPA range 50–65 miles.
See electric configurationsGas configurations (10)
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2.5L 4-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd (Most efficient) | 2.5L 4-cyl | RWD | 20 | 24 | 22 | $2,970 |
| Pickup 2.5L 4-cyl RWD Automatic 4-spd | 2.5L 4-cyl | RWD | 18 | 23 | 20 | $3,270 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| FFV 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 16 | 21 | 18 | $3,630 |
| FFV 3.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 4-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
| FFV 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 20 | 17 | $3,840 |
Show 0 more configurations
| Trim | Engine | Drive | City | Hwy | Comb. | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl RWD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | RWD | 14 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Manual 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 15 | 19 | 16 | $4,080 |
| Pickup 4.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 5-spd | 4.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 17 | 15 | $4,360 |
| FFV 3.0L 6-cyl 4WD Automatic 4-spd | 3.0L 6-cyl | 4WD | 14 | 18 | 15 | $4,360 |
Flex-fuel (E85) configurations are costed on gasoline, not E85.
Electric configurations (2)
| Trim | Drive | kWh/100 mi | MPGe | Range | $/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pickup 2-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) (Most efficient) | 2-Wheel Drive | 58 | 58 | 50 mi | $1,590 |
| Pickup 2-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) | 2-Wheel Drive | 60 | 56 | 65 mi | $1,650 |
MPGe is the distance an electric car travels on 33.7 kWh, the energy in a gallon of gasoline. Fewer kWh per 100 miles means a lower running cost.
Fuel cost by state
Yearly cost of the Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD: $3,770 in California and $2,420 in Texas, a $1,350 difference.
- California $3,770
- Washington $3,490
- New York $2,770
- Florida $2,620
- Texas $2,420
Similar cars
Closest combined MPG among MY2011 small pickup models.
Generations
- 2000-2011 (3rd gen)
- 2019-2023 (T6)
- 2024-2026 (P703)
Frequently asked questions
What gas mileage does the 2000-2011 Ford Ranger get?
EPA rates the 2000-2011 Ford Ranger at 15–24 MPG combined across 116 configurations and 12 model years. The most efficient version, the 2011 Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD, is rated 24 MPG (22 city, 27 highway). By powertrain: Gas: 15–24 MPG; Electric: 56–58 MPGe.
Which years had the best MPG in the 2000-2011 Ford Ranger?
The Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD reached the generation's best combined rating, 24 MPG, in 2010 and 2011. The lowest top rating, 22 MPG, was in 2000.
Did EPA ratings change during the 2000-2011 Ford Ranger?
Yes. Ratings changed in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
How much does it cost to fuel a 2011 Ford Ranger per year?
Driving 15,000 miles a year at regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026), the Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD costs about $2,770 a year. Across all 6 configurations the cost runs $2,770–$4,110 a year. That is a $1,340 difference between the cheapest and the costliest configuration.
How much does it cost to drive a 2011 Ford Ranger 100 miles?
About $18.47 per 100 miles for the Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD at regular gasoline $4.36/gal (U.S. average, Sep 2026), and between $18.47 and $27.40 across all configurations. That is the annual cost over 15,000 miles divided by 150.
Is the 2011 Ford Ranger more efficient in the city or on the highway?
The Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD is rated 22 city and 27 highway MPG, so it is more efficient on the highway, by 5 MPG.
How does the 2011 Ford Ranger compare with other small pickup configurations?
The Ranger 2.3L 4-cyl RWD costs about $2,770 a year to fuel, $750 less than the class median of $3,520, and less than 10 of 10 small pickup configurations. The comparison covers all 56 rated small pickup configurations for MY2011, not weighted by sales.
Is the 2011 Ford Ranger different from the 2010 model?
The most efficient configuration stays at 24 MPG. Its annual cost goes from $2,720 to $2,770, $50 more. EPA lists 6 configurations for 2011 against 6 configurations for 2010. See the 2010 Ford Ranger for that year.